Visit Twellow.com

Scotland May Jail Indecent Emailers


Careful what you say, lad

While it's strangely comforting to know daft, prudish politicians aren't restricted to petering along on American marble, join me in echoing any middle-fingered dissent arising in Scotland (and you know their kilts are flying up over this one) around lawmakers' plan to criminalize people who "communicate indecently" via email, text message or other media.

I thought the Scots invented indecent communication when they invented golf. Well, it's actually more about punishing creepy pervs, however you'd like to define that loaded phrase, but as we learned recently in one of our own federal courts, what one judge finds humorous, another finds deviant.

According to Out-Law.com, a site run by an international law firm, the language in a bill introduced by Scottish legislators is not just broad, but puritanical in scope while calling for draconian punishment. Violators face up to ten years in prison if the content of their messages is deemed indecent enough.

Ten years for a Goatse prank? For 2 Girls 1 Cup?* 

Yeah okay. I can dig on that idea—ten years is bit harsher than I would have imagined, though. A thorough flogging would suffice, I think, and a community service gig with Roto Rooter.

The law makes illegal "causing a person to see or hear an indecent communication" even by reading a passage in a book, without their consent. It bars sending unsolicited, indecent images of real or imaginary persons, or sending messages "designed to give the sender sexual gratification."

Scotland Yard may have a hard time proving that last one. Clearly, the legislators' intentions are good—they seem to be aiming for the dark, scummy corners of sexual assault and harassment. But Out-Law suggests there's a bit too much room for interpretation and abuse, not to mention the impact such laws can have on free speech.    

Unwanted flirting, for example, could fall under the umbrella the Law Commission of Scotland is raising. No "dirty" cartoons, no "dirty" tricks—maybe no "dirty" jokes. And deciding whether it's dirty is up to a court. Take it from us, Scotland, obscene and/or indecent are not words easily and universally defined.


*Warning: Do not google these if you're not already aware. You don't ever, ever want to know.
 

Digg This! StumbleUpon This!
AddThis Social Bookmark Widget

About the author:
Jason Lee Miller is a WebProNews editor and writer covering business and technology.

Comments

Sign

@Ron - No one, it will exist for people to be able to take a text you sent to them that they find offensive to the police and you will get arrested. Add a new way you worry about ticking people off with. Had an argument with a coworker in accounting over politics but didnt take their name off your email mailing list? Oops youve been reported for digital harassment. If this thing comes even close to passing other countries will begin to consider drafting their own versions

consenting texts

What about consenting "texts" between two adults where nether is offended?

who is going to read and police all this stuff.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.