In a letter to the House Judiciary Committee, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg expressed his regret over giving in to government censorship requests in recent years.

Social media platforms have increasingly been under pressure over content moderation, especially during the pandemic, with government officials pushing for platforms to take down misinformation. While Meta did accommodate the government on a number of occasions, Zuckerberg now says he regrets doing so.

Zuckerberg detailed his company’s interactions with the US government in his letter.

In 2021, senior officials from the Biden Administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn’t agree. Ultimately, it was our decision whether or not to take content down, and we own our decisions, including the COVID-19-related changed we made to our enforcement in the wake of this pressure. i believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it. I also think we made some choices that, with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn’t make today. Like I said to our teams at the time, I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any Administration in either direction — and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again.

A White House spokesperson gave a statement to CNN defending the government’s position.

“Our position has been clear and consistent: we believe tech companies and other private actors should take into account the effects their actions have on the American people, while making independent choices about the information they present,” the spokesperson said.

Zuckerberg’s Hypocrisy

When taken at face value, Zuckerberg’s letter comes across as a strong pro-free speech stand. When viewed under a more critical eye, however, it’s hard to see the letter as anything but a self-serving attempt to hedge his bets with the upcoming election.

For example, Zuckerberg does not explain why he gave in to the pressure when “at the time” he was telling employees that Meta should not give in to any administration, regardless of party affiliation or politics. It would be one thing if Zuckerberg admitted he thought the decision was right at the time, and later came to believe it was misinformed. But to tell his employees he thought Meta should not compromise, then turn right around and compromise, and then write a letter three years later saying he regrets it, comes across as disingenuous.

At the end of the day, Zuckerberg knows better than anyone that Big Tech, and especially social media platforms, are far from the favorite industries of either political party. By taking the stand he is, Zuckerberg likely hopes to at least level the playing field and ensure he doesn’t significantly alienate either party.